The Mercy Corps Blog

Blog Post Posted August 27, 2009, 8:41 am by Ruth Allen

Women take the lead

Crossposted from:

As long as I can remember, there’s been a world map hanging in my grandmother’s kitchen.

When I called to let her know I was off to Liberia soon, she was quiet for a minute and then yelped when she found the small west African country — just about the size of Tennessee — located between Cote d’Ivorie, Guinea and Sierra Leone. Over the coming few weeks we both learned a lot more about Liberia.

Crisscrossing the country to interview Liberians about issues important in their communities, it wasn’t surprising to hear food security as a recurring concern. Liberia is still emerging from decades of political turmoil and outright civil war, which decimated the country’s agriculture industry and killed or displaced a third of the population.

At a food security conference last year, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon used an experience in Liberia to illustrate the severity and scale of the global food crisis. “The poorest of the poor spend two-thirds or more of their income on food. They will be the hardest hit. I have seen this for myself. In Liberia recently, I met people who normally would buy rice by the bag. Today, they buy it by the cup.”

Photo: Ruth Allen

But as I saw, it’s not just the UN and groups like Mercy Corps, farmers, or the government who are working on improving food security in Liberia. Some of the most creative and effective efforts are by local women’s organizations.

In the village of Bopolu, a community-based women’s organization identified the biggest threat to their community’s development as “the hungry season” — the difficult months between the time when the rice stocks run out and the next harvest.

In just a year since forming, the group adapted a traditional savings and loan model to generate funds for several members to attend training about methods to improve crop yields, negotiated with the district commissioner for land, and solicited community donations from their personal stores of seeds. As a result, the chairwoman said, “this year has been good and women who are not even members watch us and are inspired to use the new method.”

Meanwhile back in the U.S., Grandma was learning all about Liberia’s President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, the first elected female head of state in Africa. “She’s quite a woman! I saw her on Larry King talking about how women helped lead the peace movement.”

Indeed she was right. Liberia is an exceptional case of women organizing for peaceful change. Groups like the Women In Peace Network (WIPNET-Liberia) are now mobilizing those same women who rallied to end the civil war to tackle Liberia’s long-term development issues. Program Coordinator Lindora Diawara summed up WIPNET’s new motivation by recalling what she hears all the time from network members: “We volunteered for peace and held the placards, but even now we can not read those same placards. We need to know [literacy] so we can make a living and feed our families.” Adult women’s literacy and food security are now top priorities for WIPNET.

When I returned home and told Grandma this story she said, “Well that’s smart. Mercy Corps should really listen to those women!”

• 2 comments

Blog Post Posted June 17, 2009, 9:11 am by Ruth Allen

It's time for the U.S. to ratify core UN conventions

People in Liberia, especially women, have become more aware of their rights since the country's long civil war ended six years ago. Photo: Emmy Lang-Kennedy for Mercy Corps

In May, amidst headlines of new military activity in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan, two other stories signaled an opening for a different kind of U.S. engagement in the world that has great significance for groups like Mercy Corps.

The first was the submission of House Resolution 416, calling on the U.S. to “become an international human rights leader” by ratifying and implementing several United Nations (UN) conventions — including rights for children and the disabled, as well as measures to eliminate discrimination against women. The second signal came when the U.S. won election to the UN Human Rights Council for the first time in history, after the Obama administration ended U.S. policy that boycotted the council earlier this year.

While the hard work has just begun, U.S. sleeves have been rolled up. The potential to do good is vast.

The U.S. track record of supporting the UN and international cooperation on conventions is decidedly mixed. While countless individual Americans and U.S.-based organizations have been instrumental in leading the charge for human rights since before the UN’s founding in the 1940s, the U.S. remains one of an increasingly small group of holdouts that have not ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).

Take CEDAW for example— the most controversial of the three — a convention that is often described as “an international bill of rights for women.” Despite being one of the 64 states to sign CEDAW on the first day possible in 1980, the U.S. was not among the first 20 states to ratify the convention and put it into force — nor have we been among the 164 ratifying states since. Our leadership in crafting the document is well acknowledged, as are our advocacy efforts for its ratification in other countries. We've supported women using the Convention as an essential instrument for holding their governments accountable for equal treatment of women under the law.

However, American women have never themselves enjoyed the benefits of CEDAW.

The arguments against U.S. ratification are falling increasingly flat in 2009. One of the main concerns has been that the U.S. would relinquish too much power to the international community, with the provisions of the Convention superseding federal and state laws. CEDAW, like most international agreements, allows countries to express "reservations, understandings and declarations" where there are discrepancies between the international convention and domestic law.

This is a moot point, however, since U.S. law for the most part already complies with the requirements of the Convention — and, conversely, the principles of the Convention are already in line with the letter and values of U.S. Constitution. Regardless, ratifying CEDAW grants no enforcement authority to the UN.

As for America’s new role on the UN Human Rights Council, this is a perfect opportunity for reform from within. The Council has come under sharp criticism in recent years due to the membership of some of the world’s worst human rights offenders. With China, Cuba and Saudi Arabia joining the U.S. as newly-elected members, the incoming class is no exception. Yet, being on the Council puts countries in the international spotlight, which has aided organizations’ successful pressuring of many governments to adopt or implement existing laws that protect a wide array of human rights.

I recently returned from Liberia, the small West African nation founded by freed American slaves in 1847. In the six years since Liberia’s 14-year civil war ended, one of the major success stories is the general public’s awareness about their rights. Even women in rural counties who missed the opportunity for any formal education now pore over summaries of Liberia’s inheritance law as homework for adult literacy classes. Demand for peace has transformed into advocacy for the right to an education, to equal representation in government and fair treatment in the workplace.

It is inspiring to see Liberia turning this corner. It is also a stark reminder of the work still left to do — whether it’s earning access to education in Liberia or finally achieving equal pay for America’s female workforce. Conventions such as CEDAW and bodies like the UN Human Rights Council are well positioned to help the world accomplish these and other important goals.

The U.S. Congress should expedite passage of all UN conventions identified in House Resolution 416 and leverage U.S. membership on the UN Human Rights Council to renew its effective role in making human rights in the interest of every country — including ours.

• Add new comment